Hello Pavel,

> > > > diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
> > > > index f13117eed976..4b40bf66483c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp50xx.c
> > > > @@ -267,7 +267,6 @@ struct lp50xx_led {
> > > >         struct led_classdev_mc mc_cdev;
> > > >         struct lp50xx *priv;
> > > >         unsigned long bank_modules;
> > > > -       int led_intensity[LP50XX_LEDS_PER_MODULE];
> > > >         u8 ctrl_bank_enabled;
> > > >         int led_number;
> > > >  };
> > >
> > > ? Does not make sense and changelog does not help.
> >
> > This is an unused variable which is in the driver
> > (same as the regulator). Should I provide a patch on its own for that
> > or just describe in the changelog?
> 
> Lets do separate patch here. DT changes will need Ack from Rob, this
> can go in directly.

Okay, I will submit a separate patch

> Can you or Dan submit patch getting the regulator support to work? If
> not, I guess we should remove the regulator support after all.

To be true I am fairly new to the kernel and have no idea
how to test this. So no, I don't want provide a patch (except
for removing), sorry.

Best Regards,

   Sven
 

Reply via email to