On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 05:07:51PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Stafford,
> 
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:43 PM Stafford Horne <sho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 12:49:31PM +0100, Jan Henrik Weinstock wrote:
> > > Use the device tree to determine the present cpus instead of assuming all
> > > CONFIG_NRCPUS are actually present in the system.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Henrik Weinstock <jan.weinst...@rwth-aachen.de>
> >
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > I cannot apply this patch, it seems you somehow sent it signed as a 
> > multipart
> > message via Thunderbird.
> >
> > This causes errors when trying to apply, even after I tried to manually fix 
> > the
> > patch mail:
> >
> >     Applying: openrisc: use device tree to determine present cpus
> >     error: sha1 information is lacking or useless 
> > (arch/openrisc/kernel/smp.c).
> >     error: could not build fake ancestor
> >     Patch failed at 0001 openrisc: use device tree to determine present cpus
> >
> > Can you send this using 'git send-email?'
> >
> > If not I can get it applied with some work, otherwise you can point me to a 
> > git
> > repo which I can pull it from.
> 
> "b4 am 6dbc27f8-5261-59c5-acba-70f6c6a74...@rwth-aachen.de" works
> fine for me.
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/b4/b4.git

Did it work?  For me I got, base not found.

    Looking up
    
https://lore.kernel.org/r/6dbc27f8-5261-59c5-acba-70f6c6a74ba1%40rwth-aachen.de
    Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/lkml
    Analyzing 9 messages in the thread
    Will use the latest revision: v2
    You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
    ---
    Writing
    
./v2_20210201_jan_weinstock_openrisc_use_device_tree_to_determine_present_cpus.mbx
      [PATCH v2] openrisc: use device tree to determine present cpus
    ---
    Total patches: 1
    ---
     Link:
    
https://lore.kernel.org/r/6dbc27f8-5261-59c5-acba-70f6c6a74...@rwth-aachen.de
     Base: not found
           git am
    
./v2_20210201_jan_weinstock_openrisc_use_device_tree_to_determine_present_cpus.mbx

-Stafford

Reply via email to