There is no need to use API with _irqsave in grgpio_irq_handler(),
because it already be in a irq-disabled context.

Signed-off-by: Luo Jiaxing <luojiax...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c
index f954359..fa5aa31 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-grgpio.c
@@ -195,11 +195,10 @@ static irqreturn_t grgpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
 {
        struct grgpio_priv *priv = dev;
        int ngpio = priv->gc.ngpio;
-       unsigned long flags;
        int i;
        int match = 0;
 
-       spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
+       spin_lock(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock);
 
        /*
         * For each gpio line, call its interrupt handler if it its underlying
@@ -215,7 +214,7 @@ static irqreturn_t grgpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
                }
        }
 
-       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock, flags);
+       spin_unlock(&priv->gc.bgpio_lock);
 
        if (!match)
                dev_warn(priv->dev, "No gpio line matched irq %d\n", irq);
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to