On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 09:30:43AM -0800, Daniel Latypov wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 11:13 PM Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > url: > > https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Latypov/kunit-support-running-subsets-of-test-suites-from/20210204-074405 > > > > base: 88bb507a74ea7d75fa49edd421eaa710a7d80598 > > config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210202 (attached as .config) > > compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0 > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> > > > > smatch warnings: > > lib/kunit/executor.c:110 kunit_run_all_tests() error: double free of > > 'suite_set.start' > > > > vim +110 lib/kunit/executor.c > > > > 8c0d884986ba22 Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04 96 int > > kunit_run_all_tests(void) > > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 97 { > > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 98 struct kunit_suite > > * const * const *suites; > > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 99 > > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 100 struct suite_set > > suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(); > > 45dcbb6f5ef78b Brendan Higgins 2020-08-04 101 > > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 102 > > kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set); > > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 103 > > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 104 for (suites = > > suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) > > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 105 > > __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites); > > aac35468ca20a3 Alan Maguire 2020-08-04 106 > > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 107 if (filter_glob) { > > /* a copy was made of each array */ > > d5554dd78a454b Daniel Latypov 2021-02-03 108 for (suites > > = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > This will free "suite_set.start" will in the first iteration through the > > loop > > Ah, the loop is supposed to contain `kfree(*suites)`. > I'll fix the patch and resend. > > I'm not familiar with conventions but it feels like adding Reported-by > on the amended patch would almost imply the report suggested the need > for the ability to filter suites. > So I'll add an informal attribution in the cover letter. > > Thanks!
These emails are autogenerated by the kbuild bot and I just look them over and hit forward. regards, dan carpenter
