On 2/9/21 7:39 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Vincenzo,
> 
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on next-20210125]
> [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core xlnx/master arm/for-next soc/for-next 
> kvmarm/next linus/master hnaz-linux-mm/master v5.11-rc6 v5.11-rc5 v5.11-rc4 
> v5.11-rc6]

The patches are based on linux-next/akpm and since they depend on some patches
present on that tree, can be applied only on linux-next/akpm and 
linux-next/master.

The dependency is reported in the cover letter.

Thanks,
Vincenzo

> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vincenzo-Frascino/arm64-ARMv8-5-A-MTE-Add-async-mode-support/20210209-080907
> base:    59fa6a163ffabc1bf25c5e0e33899e268a96d3cc
> config: x86_64-randconfig-s021-20210209 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
> reproduce:
>         # apt-get install sparse
>         # sparse version: v0.6.3-215-g0fb77bb6-dirty
>         # 
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/93bd347e4877e3616f7db64f488ebb469718dd68
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
> Vincenzo-Frascino/arm64-ARMv8-5-A-MTE-Add-async-mode-support/20210209-080907
>         git checkout 93bd347e4877e3616f7db64f488ebb469718dd68
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=x86_64 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    ld: mm/kasan/report.o: in function `end_report':
>>> mm/kasan/report.c:90: undefined reference to `kasan_flag_async'
>>> ld: mm/kasan/report.c:90: undefined reference to `kasan_flag_async'
> 
> 
> vim +90 mm/kasan/report.c
> 
>     87        
>     88        static void end_report(unsigned long *flags, unsigned long addr)
>     89        {
>   > 90                if (!kasan_flag_async)
>     91                        trace_error_report_end(ERROR_DETECTOR_KASAN, 
> addr);
>     92                
> pr_err("==================================================================\n");
>     93                add_taint(TAINT_BAD_PAGE, LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE);
>     94                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&report_lock, *flags);
>     95                if (panic_on_warn && !test_bit(KASAN_BIT_MULTI_SHOT, 
> &kasan_flags)) {
>     96                        /*
>     97                         * This thread may hit another WARN() in the 
> panic path.
>     98                         * Resetting this prevents additional WARN() 
> from panicking the
>     99                         * system on this thread.  Other threads are 
> blocked by the
>    100                         * panic_mutex in panic().
>    101                         */
>    102                        panic_on_warn = 0;
>    103                        panic("panic_on_warn set ...\n");
>    104                }
>    105        #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
>    106                if (kasan_flag_panic)
>    107                        panic("kasan.fault=panic set ...\n");
>    108        #endif
>    109                kasan_enable_current();
>    110        }
>    111        
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-...@lists.01.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo

Reply via email to