CCing more folks.
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 9:14 AM Muchun Song <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The swap charges the actual number of swap entries on cgroup v2.
> If a swap cache page is charged successful, and then we uncharge
> the swap counter. It is wrong on cgroup v2. Because the swap
> entry is not freed.
>
> Fixes: 2d1c498072de ("mm: memcontrol: make swap tracking an integral part of
> memory control")
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <[email protected]>
What's the user visible impact of this change?
One impact I can see is that without this patch meminfo's (SwapTotal -
SwapFree) is larger than the sum of top level memory.swap.current.
This change will reduce that gap.
BTW what about per-cpu slots_ret cache? Should we call
mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap() before putting in the cache after this
change?
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index c737c8f05992..be6bc5044150 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6753,7 +6753,7 @@ int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct
> mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> memcg_check_events(memcg, page);
> local_irq_enable();
>
> - if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
> + if (!cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && PageSwapCache(page))
> {
> swp_entry_t entry = { .val = page_private(page) };
> /*
> * The swap entry might not get freed for a long time,
> --
> 2.11.0
>
