On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:26:55PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:41:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> ...
> > > + seq_printf(m, "\t\tuapi: [FB:%d] ", fb ? fb->base.id : 0);
> > > + if (fb)
> > > + seq_printf(m, "%p4cc", &fb->format->format);
> > > + else
> > > + seq_puts(m, "n/a");
> >
> > > + seq_printf(m, ",0x%llx,%dx%d, visible=%s, src=" DRM_RECT_FP_FMT ",
> > > dst=" DRM_RECT_FMT ", rotation=%s\n",
> >
> > Why not to keep two seq_printf() calls?
> >
> > if (fb) {
> > seq_printf();
> > } else {
> > seq_printf();
> > }
> >
> > ?
>
> I could, but it'd repeat a lot of the same format string that is very
> complicated right now. Therefore I thought it's better to split.
It's fine, why not?
> Or do you mean seq_printf() vs. seq_puts()? checkpatch.pl (rightly) warns
> about it.
If it doesn't take run-time parameters, then definitely
if (fb)
seq_printf();
else
seq_puts();
> > > fb ? fb->modifier : 0,
> > > fb ? fb->width : 0, fb ? fb->height : 0,
> > > plane_visibility(plane_state),
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
