> On Feb 16, 2021, at 10:59 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:53:09PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote: >>> On Feb 16, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > >>> I'm not sure I can explain it yet. It did get me looking at >>> on_each_cpu() and it appears that wants to be converted too, something >>> like the below perhaps. >> >> Looks like a good cleanup, but I cannot say I understand the problem and how >> it would solve it. Err... > > Yeah, me neither. Bit of a mystery so far.
I’ll try to see whether I can figure out about it. Perhaps there is somewhere an assumption of ordering between the local and remote function invocations. Regardless, would you want me to have on_each_cpu() as inline or to keep it in smp.c?
