This patch corrects some erroneous dentry handling in eCryptfs.

If there is a problem creating the lower file, then there is nothing
that the persistent lower file can do to really help us. This patch
makes a vfs_create() failure in the lower filesystem always lead to an
unconditional do_create failure in eCryptfs.

Under certain sequences of operations, the eCryptfs dentry can remain
in the dcache after an unlink. This patch calls d_drop() on the
eCryptfs dentry to correct this.

eCryptfs has no business calling d_delete() directly on a lower
filesystem's dentry. This patch removes the call to d_delete() on the
lower persistent file's dentry in ecryptfs_destroy_inode().

(Thanks to David Kleikamp, Eric Sandeen, and Jeff Moyer for helping
identify and resolve this issue)

Signed-off-by: Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 fs/ecryptfs/inode.c |   20 ++++----------------
 fs/ecryptfs/super.c |    1 -
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
index 0b1ab01..5a71918 100644
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
@@ -120,22 +120,9 @@ ecryptfs_do_create(struct inode *directory_inode,
        rc = ecryptfs_create_underlying_file(lower_dir_dentry->d_inode,
                                             ecryptfs_dentry, mode, nd);
        if (rc) {
-               struct inode *ecryptfs_inode = ecryptfs_dentry->d_inode;
-               struct ecryptfs_inode_info *inode_info =
-                       ecryptfs_inode_to_private(ecryptfs_inode);
-
-               printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Error creating underlying file; "
-                      "rc = [%d]; checking for existing\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
-               if (inode_info) {
-                       mutex_lock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
-                       if (!inode_info->lower_file) {
-                               mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
-                               printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failure to set underlying "
-                                      "file; rc = [%d]\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
-                               goto out_lock;
-                       }
-                       mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
-               }
+               printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failure to create dentry in lower fs; "
+                      "rc = [%d]\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
+               goto out_lock;
        }
        rc = ecryptfs_interpose(lower_dentry, ecryptfs_dentry,
                                directory_inode->i_sb, 0);
@@ -451,6 +438,7 @@ static int ecryptfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry 
*dentry)
        dentry->d_inode->i_nlink =
                ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(dentry->d_inode)->i_nlink;
        dentry->d_inode->i_ctime = dir->i_ctime;
+       d_drop(dentry);
 out_unlock:
        unlock_parent(lower_dentry);
        return rc;
diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/super.c b/fs/ecryptfs/super.c
index f8cdab2..4859c4e 100644
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/super.c
@@ -86,7 +86,6 @@ static void ecryptfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
                        fput(inode_info->lower_file);
                        inode_info->lower_file = NULL;
                        d_drop(lower_dentry);
-                       d_delete(lower_dentry);
                }
        }
        mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
-- 
1.5.3.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to