On 01/30/21 at 03:10pm, Chen Zhou wrote:
> The lower bounds of crash kernel reservation and crash kernel low
> reservation are different, use the consistent value CRASH_ALIGN.
>
> Suggested-by: Dave Young <dyo...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzho...@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: John Donnelly <john.p.donne...@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index da769845597d..27470479e4a3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - low_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(low_size, CRASH_ALIGN, 0,
> CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX);
> + low_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(low_size, CRASH_ALIGN, CRASH_ALIGN,
> + CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX);
Acked-by: Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com>
> if (!low_base) {
> pr_err("Cannot reserve %ldMB crashkernel low memory, please try
> smaller size.\n",
> (unsigned long)(low_size >> 20));
> --
> 2.20.1
>
