From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabb...@google.com> In theory these are orthogonal, but in practice all NUMA systems are SMP. NUMA && !SMP doesn't build, everyone else is coupling them, and I don't really see any value in supporting that configuration.
Fixes: 4f0e8eef772e ("riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform") Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> Suggested-by: Atish Patra <ati...@atishpatra.org> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabb...@google.com> --- This is on fixes. --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index a998babc1237..85d626b8ce5e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ endchoice # Common NUMA Features config NUMA bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support" + depends on SMP select GENERIC_ARCH_NUMA select OF_NUMA select ARCH_SUPPORTS_NUMA_BALANCING -- 2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog