Few spelling fixes throughout the file.

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
---
 Changes from V1:
 Fixed the subject line typo.
 Measured unwanted blank lines insertion.

 fs/dlm/lock.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index 002123efc6b0..b00001c36ed5 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void del_timeout(struct dlm_lkb *lkb);
 static void toss_rsb(struct kref *kref);

 /*
- * Lock compatibilty matrix - thanks Steve
+ * Lock compatibility matrix - thanks Steve
  * UN = Unlocked state. Not really a state, used as a flag
  * PD = Padding. Used to make the matrix a nice power of two in size
  * Other states are the same as the VMS DLM.
@@ -2357,14 +2357,14 @@ static int _can_be_granted(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct 
dlm_lkb *lkb, int now,
         * 6-5: But the default algorithm for deciding whether to grant or
         * queue conversion requests does not by itself guarantee that such
         * requests are serviced on a "first come first serve" basis.  This, in
-        * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinate postponement".
+        * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinite postponement".
         *
         * 6-7: This issue is dealt with by using the optional QUECVT flag with
         * the system service employed to request a lock conversion.  This flag
         * forces certain conversion requests to be queued, even if they are
         * compatible with the granted modes of other locks on the same
         * resource.  Thus, the use of this flag results in conversion requests
-        * being ordered on a "first come first servce" basis.
+        * being ordered on a "first come first serve" basis.
         *
         * DCT: This condition is all about new conversions being able to occur
         * "in place" while the lock remains on the granted queue (assuming
--
2.26.2

Reply via email to