> It seems the correct solution would be not to hijack __cpuinit > (as your patch does), but to create a new annotation.
The rationale is that after suspend the CPU has to be reinitialized. That is because it is essentially like a reboot. All the previous CPU state is gone. It doesn't need to touch state in memory only -- if you want you could create a new annotation for functions that only touch memory; but I'm not sure it would buy all that much. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
