The call sequence in wm8960_configure_clocking is

   ret = wm8960_configure_sysclk();
   if (ret >= 0)
        goto configure_clock;

   ....

   ret = wm8960_configure_pll();

configure_clock:
   ...

wm8960_configure_sysclk is called before wm8960_configure_pll, as
there is bitclk relax on both functions, so wm8960_configure_sysclk
always return success, then wm8960_configure_pll() never be called.

With this case:
aplay -Dhw:0,0 -d 5 -r 48000 -f S24_LE -c 2 audio48k24b2c.wav
the required bitclk is 48000 * 24 * 2 = 2304000, bitclk got from
wm8960_configure_sysclk is 3072000, but if go to wm8960_configure_pll.
it can get correct bitclk 2304000.

So bitclk relax condition should be removed in wm8960_configure_sysclk,
then wm8960_configure_pll can be called, and there is also bitclk relax
function in wm8960_configure_pll.

Fixes: 3c01b9ee2ab9 ("ASoC: codec: wm8960: Relax bit clock computation")
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.w...@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.bal...@nxp.com>
---
changes in v2:
- Find the real reason for the case, just patially remove bitclk relax

 sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 12 +-----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
index df351519a3a6..847ca16b9841 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c
@@ -608,10 +608,6 @@ static const int bclk_divs[] = {
  *             - lrclk      = sysclk / dac_divs
  *             - 10 * bclk  = sysclk / bclk_divs
  *
- *     If we cannot find an exact match for (sysclk, lrclk, bclk)
- *     triplet, we relax the bclk such that bclk is chosen as the
- *     closest available frequency greater than expected bclk.
- *
  * @wm8960: codec private data
  * @mclk: MCLK used to derive sysclk
  * @sysclk_idx: sysclk_divs index for found sysclk
@@ -629,7 +625,7 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, int 
mclk,
 {
        int sysclk, bclk, lrclk;
        int i, j, k;
-       int diff, closest = mclk;
+       int diff;
 
        /* marker for no match */
        *bclk_idx = -1;
@@ -653,12 +649,6 @@ int wm8960_configure_sysclk(struct wm8960_priv *wm8960, 
int mclk,
                                        *bclk_idx = k;
                                        break;
                                }
-                               if (diff > 0 && closest > diff) {
-                                       *sysclk_idx = i;
-                                       *dac_idx = j;
-                                       *bclk_idx = k;
-                                       closest = diff;
-                               }
                        }
                        if (k != ARRAY_SIZE(bclk_divs))
                                break;
-- 
2.27.0

Reply via email to