Hi!
Well, I did a very similar patch about 2.3.3x and it got even
included in -acXX during a Linus vacation - but it got dropped for
some reason (f.i. such an approach does not work well for multi-file
modules, I was told). I re-sent it during the 2.4.0-test phase and
got no reply, so I think just adding __setup() stuff manually to
every module seems the way to go... :(
Richard.
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Werner Almesberger wrote:
> Keith Owens wrote:
> > Inconsistent methods for setting the same parameter are bad. I can and
> > will do this cleanly in 2.5.
>
> If your approach isn't overly intrusive (i.e. doesn't require changes
> to all files containing module parameters, or such), maybe you could
> make a patch for 2.4.x and wave it a little under Linus' nose. Maybe
> he likes the scent ;-)
>
> In any case, once it's in 2.5.x, and if it is as useful as I suspect
> it to be, it would probably be back-ported to 2.4 sooner or later.
>
> - Werner
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________________
> / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH [EMAIL PROTECTED] /
> /_IN_N_032__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://www.anatom.uni-tuebingen.de/~richi/
The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
