On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:58:17 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > AFAICT everything made in the past 10 years ends up using p6_nops. Is it > time to kill off ideal_nops[] and simplify life? > Well, the one bug that was reported recently was due to a box that uses a different "ideal_nops" than p6_nops. Perhaps we should ask him if there's any noticeable difference between using p6_nops for every function than the ideal_nops that as found for that box. -- Steve
