On 3/8/21 4:17 PM, Yang Shi wrote: >> Reclaim anonymous pages if a migration path is available now that >> demotion provides a non-swap recourse for reclaiming anon pages. >> >> Note that this check is subtly different from the >> anon_should_be_aged() checks. This mechanism checks whether a >> specific page in a specific context *can* actually be reclaimed, given >> current swap space and cgroup limits >> >> anon_should_be_aged() is a much simpler and more prelimiary check > Just a typo, s/prelimiary/preliminary
Got it. Thanks for the continued review, and the review tags! I'll hopefully get a new version of this out the door next week.
