On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 06:20:45PM +0800, Feng Tang wrote:
> From: Ben Widawsky <ben.widaw...@intel.com>
>
> MPOL_LOCAL is a bit weird because it is simply a different name for an
> existing behavior (preferred policy with no node mask). It has been this
> way since it was added here:
> commit 479e2802d09f ("mm: mempolicy: Make MPOL_LOCAL a real policy")
>
> It is so similar to MPOL_PREFERRED in fact that when the policy is
> created in mpol_new, the mode is set as PREFERRED, and an internal state
> representing LOCAL doesn't exist.
>
> To prevent future explorers from scratching their head as to why
> MPOL_LOCAL isn't defined in the mpol_ops table, add a small comment
> explaining the situations.
>
> v2:
> Change comment to refer to mpol_new (Michal)
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200630212517.308045-2-ben.widaw...@intel.com
> #Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
This shouldn't be masked:
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
I did the mask when sending for internal review, and forgot to restore
it, sorry for the noise.
Thanks,
Feng
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widaw...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.t...@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/mempolicy.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 2c3a865..5730fc1 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations
> mpol_ops[MPOL_MAX] = {
> .create = mpol_new_bind,
> .rebind = mpol_rebind_nodemask,
> },
> + /* [MPOL_LOCAL] - see mpol_new() */
> };
>
> static int migrate_page_add(struct page *page, struct list_head *pagelist,
> --
> 2.7.4
