From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
From: Thomas Schoebel-Theuer <[email protected]>
This patch and problem analysis is specific for 4.4 LTS, due to incomplete
backporting of other fixes. Later LTS series have different backports.
The following is obviously incorrect:
static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *this,
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
{
[...]
raw_spin_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
[...]
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
[...]
}
The 4.4-specific fix should probably go in the direction of
b4abf91047c,
making everything irq-safe.
Probably, backporting of b4abf91047c
to 4.4 LTS could thus be another good idea.
However, this might involve some more 4.4-specific work and
require thorough testing:
> git log --oneline v4.4..b4abf91047c -- kernel/futex.c
> kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | wc -l
10
So this patch is just an obvious quickfix for now.
Hint: the lock order is documented in 4.9.y and later. A similar
documenting is missing in 4.4.y. Please somebody either backport also,
or write a new description, if there would be some differences I cannot
easily see at the moment. Without reliable docs,
inspection of the locking correctness may become a pain.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Schoebel-Theuer <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Fixes: 394fc4981426 ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q state")
Fixes: 6510e4a2d04f ("futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific rt_mutex API")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
kernel/futex.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1408,7 +1408,7 @@ static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uad
if (pi_state->owner != current)
return -EINVAL;
- raw_spin_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
new_owner = rt_mutex_next_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
/*
