On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:45:26AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> I never got a response on my message, but I have just receieved:
> 
> | Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:05:00 +0100
> | From: Joerg Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | To: ARM Linux Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | Subject: 2.6.24-rc7 : oprofile on MPCore broken
> | 
> | Hello,
> | 
> | just tried to use oprofile on 2.6.24-rc7.
> | It does not detect the right processor
> |  (/dev/oprofile/cpu_type contains "timer").
> | 
> | As I don't know exactly, how the string
> | "arm/mpcore" from arch/arm/oprofile/op_model_mpcore.c
> | gets feeded into that file, maybe someone else can help ?
> 
> So people are hitting the resulting mess created by 
> 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9.
> Can we please fix this regression one way or another please?
> 
> I don't particularly like stuffing the options into some random place
> in the architectures Kconfig file when they should stay along side the
> instrumentation configuration entries.

Below is the patch I already sent on 28 Dec 2007 that stuffs it into 
Kconfig.instrumentation.

Technically it shouldn't make any difference whether this patch or
Mathieu's patch that stuffs it into arch/arm/Kconfig gets applied, but 
one of them should be applied for 2.6.24 (plus either mine or Mathieu's 
fix for the blackfin HARDWARE_PM support broken by the same commit).

I found the bugs in Mathieu's commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9,
I wrote patches that restore the status quo, Cc'ed all people even
remotely related to this issue, and I opened the Bugzilla bugs required
for getting them on the regression lists. Mathieu wants the regressions
he introduced fixed different from what my patches did and that's not a
problem for me (his patches are also OK).

What went wrong that his regression fixes did not land in Linus' tree?

cu
Adrian


<--  snip  -->


This patch restores the ARMv6 OProfile support that was killed by
commit 09cadedbdc01f1a4bea1f427d4fb4642eaa19da9.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---

 kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

7fc221ef169610b5eac98e2ddd641811c0d53e4a 
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
index 468f47a..4453187 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation
@@ -29,2 +29,17 @@ config OPROFILE

+config OPROFILE_ARMV6
+       bool
+       depends on OPROFILE && ARM && CPU_V6 && !SMP
+       default y
+       select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+
+config OPROFILE_MPCORE
+       bool
+       depends on OPROFILE && ARM && CPU_V6 && SMP
+       default y
+       select OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+
+config OPROFILE_ARM11_CORE
+       bool
+
 config KPROBES
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to