On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:46:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 19:20 +0800, Wang Qing wrote: > > > Why not just use wake_up_process(). > > > > IMO this is not an improvement. There are other places where explicit > > TASK_NORMAL is used as well, and they're all perfectly clear as is. > > Arguably those could all be converted to wake_up_process() as well. > It's a very small kernel code size optimization. There's about 3 such > places, could be converted in a single patch.
It's still pointless churn IMO.
