Hi, is there any reason why kfree() takes a const pointer just to degrade it with the call to slab_free()/__cache_free() again? The promise that the pointee is not modified is just bogus in this case, anyway, isn't it?
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
