On Jan 16, 2008 12:34 AM, Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 12:21:33 pm Ingo Molnar wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > * Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > " > > > commit e5ed385fa0d6f35406e3e3ed75e5eb9adeb811df > > > Author: Balaji Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Tue Jan 15 16:53:29 2008 +0100 > > > > > > Assign IRQs to HPET Timers > > > " > > > in x86.git > > > > > > cause my servers hang > > > after > > > Calling initcall 0xffffffff80b9a465: hpet_late_init+0x0/0x100() .. > Looks like IRQ 31 is assigned to timer 3, even without the patch! I wonder > who wrote the number 31. But the manual says > that it is zero by default. > > I think we should check whether the timer has been allocated an IRQ before > proceeding to assign one to it. > Here is a patch that does this. > > Yinghai, could you please apply this on top of my patch and check ? > > --- > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c ... >
it works YH -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
