* john stultz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 18:33 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Thanks John for doing this!
> > 
> > (comments imbedded)
> > 
> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, john stultz wrote:
> > > + int num = !cs->base_num;
> > > + cycle_t offset = (now - cs->base[!num].cycle_base_last);
> > > + offset &= cs->mask;
> > > + cs->base[num].cycle_base = cs->base[!num].cycle_base + offset;
> > > + cs->base[num].cycle_base_last = now;
> > 
> > I would think that we would need some sort of barrier here. Otherwise,
> > base_num could be updated before all the cycle_base. I'd expect a smp_wmb
> > is needed.
> 
> Hopefully addressed in the current version.
> 
> 
> > > Index: monotonic-cleanup/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- monotonic-cleanup.orig/kernel/time/timekeeping.c      2008-01-16 
> > > 12:21:46.000000000 -0800
> > > +++ monotonic-cleanup/kernel/time/timekeeping.c   2008-01-16 
> > > 14:15:31.000000000 -0800
> > > @@ -71,10 +71,12 @@
> > >   */
> > >  static inline s64 __get_nsec_offset(void)
> > >  {
> > > - cycle_t cycle_delta;
> > > + cycle_t now, cycle_delta;
> > >   s64 ns_offset;
> > >
> > > - cycle_delta = clocksource_get_cycles(clock, clocksource_read(clock));
> > > + now = clocksource_read(clock);
> > > + cycle_delta = (now - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
> > > + cycle_delta += clock->cycle_accumulated;
> > 
> > Is the above just to decouple the two methods?
> 
> Yep. clocksource_get_cycles() ended up not being as useful as an helper
> function (I was hoping the arch vsyscall implementations could use it,
> but they've done too much optimization - although that may reflect a
> need up the chain to the clocksource structure).
> 

The problem with vsyscall is that we will have a hard time disabling
preemption :( Therefore, insuring that the read of the data is done in a
timely manner is hard to do.

Mathieu

> thanks
> -john
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to