On 3/26/21 9:45 AM, Tom Saeger wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:41:49AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 3/25/21 9:04 PM, Tom Saeger wrote:
>>>
>>> s/Additonal/Additional/
>>> s/assocaited/associated/
>>> s/assocaited/associated/
>>> s/assocating/associating/
>>> s/becasue/because/
>>> s/configred/configured/
>>> s/deactive/deactivate/
>>> s/followings/following/
>>> s/funtion/function/
>>> s/heirarchy/hierarchy/
>>> s/intiailized/initialized/
>>> s/prefered/preferred/
>>> s/readded/read/
>>> s/Secion/Section/
>>> s/soley/solely/
>>
>> While I'm generally happy to accept any patch that makes sense, the
>> recent influx of speling fixes have me less than excited. They just
>> add complications to backports and stable patches, for example, and
>> I'd prefer not to take them for that reason alone.
> 
> Nod.
> 
> In that case - perhaps adding these entries to scripts/spelling.txt
> would at least catch some going forward?
> 
> I can send that.

That seems like a good idea.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Reply via email to