On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:51:55AM +0100, Alexander Lochmann wrote:
> Some members of transaction_t are allowed to be read without
> any lock being held if consistency doesn't matter.
> Based on LockDoc's findings, we extended the locking
> documentation of those members.
> Each one of them is marked with a short comment:
> "no lock for quick racy checks".
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lochmann <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Horst Schirmeier <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Thanks, applied. I had to fix up the patch, which was mailer-damaged,
and I also reflowed the comments.
- Ted
