On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 10:40:08PM -0700, Deborah Brouwer wrote:
> To conform with Linux kernel coding style, replace goto statement that
> does no cleanup with a direct return.  To preserve meaning, copy comments
> from the original goto statement to the return statement.  Identified by
> the checkpatch warning: WARNING: void function return statements are not
> generally useful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deborah Brouwer <deborahbrouwer3...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c 
> b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c
> index 391c59490718..d21f21857c20 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_dm.c
> @@ -139,7 +139,9 @@ void rtw_hal_dm_watchdog(struct adapter *Adapter)
>       hw_init_completed = Adapter->hw_init_completed;
>  
>       if (!hw_init_completed)
> -             goto skip_dm;
> +             /*  Check GPIO to determine current RF on/off and Pbc status. */
> +             /*  Check Hardware Radio ON/OFF or not */
> +             return;

It does not make sense to have the comments in two places here.  The
original code is just fine, there's nothing wrong with the goto
statement here.

thanks,

greg k-h

Reply via email to