On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 02:47:11PM -0500, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:
> On 4/1/21 1:53 PM, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote:

> > Alternatively, I could just move the SYM_INNER_LABEL(ftrace_graph_call..) 
> > to outside the ifdef.

> Or, even better, I could just use ftrace_call+4 because that would be the 
> return
> address for the tracer function at ftrace_call:

> I think that would be cleaner. And, I don't need the complicated comments for 
> ftrace_graph_call.

> Is this acceptable?

I think either of those should be fine.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to