On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:20:46 -0800 Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Introduce printk_address to X86_32 in a simplified form for > now. Reformat X86_64 printk_address to avoid two declarations. > > Change the printk formats on X86_32 and 64 to be similar. I'm not entirely convinced on this; I need to look closer but it appears the 32 bit version doesn't use the "reliable" argument to print a ? in front of the dubious backtrace entries; that would be sort of a step backwards; ( -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use [EMAIL PROTECTED] For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
