On 4/6/21 5:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 07:42:03PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
The handling of sysrq key can be activated by echoing the key to
/proc/sysrq-trigger or via the magic key sequence typed into a terminal
that is connected to the system in some way (serial, USB or other mean).
In the former case, the handling is done in a user context. In the
latter case, it is likely to be in an interrupt context.
[ 7809.796281] </NMI>
[ 7809.796282] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x32/0x40
[ 7809.796283] print_cpu+0x261/0x7c0
[ 7809.796283] sysrq_sched_debug_show+0x34/0x50
[ 7809.796284] sysrq_handle_showstate+0xc/0x20
[ 7809.796284] __handle_sysrq.cold.11+0x48/0xfb
[ 7809.796285] write_sysrq_trigger+0x2b/0x30
[ 7809.796285] proc_reg_write+0x39/0x60
[ 7809.796286] vfs_write+0xa5/0x1a0
[ 7809.796286] ksys_write+0x4f/0xb0
[ 7809.796287] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1a0
[ 7809.796287] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
[ 7809.796288] RIP: 0033:0x7fabe4ceb648
The purpose of sched_debug_lock is to serialize the use of the global
cgroup_path[] buffer in print_cpu(). The rests of the printk calls don't
need serialization from sched_debug_lock.
The print_cpu() function has two callers - sched_debug_show() and
sysrq_sched_debug_show().
So what idiot is doing sysrq and that proc file at the same time? Why is
it a problem now?
We got a customer bug report on watchdog panic because a process somehow
stay within the sched_debug_lock for too long. I don't know what exactly
the customer was doing, but we can reproduce the panic just by having 2
parallel "echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger" commands. This happens on
certain selected systems. I was using some Dell systems for my testing.
Of course, it is not sensible to have more than one sysrq happening at
the same time. However, a parallel thread accessing /proc/sched_debug is
certainly possible. That invokes similar code path.
@@ -470,16 +468,49 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int
cpu, struct task_group
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sched_debug_lock);
static char group_path[PATH_MAX];
+static enum {
+ TOKEN_NONE,
+ TOKEN_ACQUIRED,
+ TOKEN_NA /* Not applicable */
+} console_token = TOKEN_ACQUIRED;
+/*
+ * All the print_cpu() callers from sched_debug_show() will be allowed
+ * to contend for sched_debug_lock and use group_path[] as their SEQ_printf()
+ * calls will be much faster. However only one print_cpu() caller from
+ * sysrq_sched_debug_show() which outputs to the console will be allowed
+ * to use group_path[]. Another parallel console writer will have to use
+ * a shorter stack buffer instead. Since the console output will be garbled
+ * anyway, truncation of some cgroup paths shouldn't be a big issue.
+ */
+#define SEQ_printf_task_group_path(m, tg, fmt...) \
+{ \
+ unsigned long flags; \
+ int token = m ? TOKEN_NA \
+ : xchg_acquire(&console_token, TOKEN_NONE); \
+ \
+ if (token == TOKEN_NONE) { \
+ char buf[128]; \
+ task_group_path(tg, buf, sizeof(buf)); \
+ SEQ_printf(m, fmt, buf); \
+ } else { \
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sched_debug_lock, flags); \
+ task_group_path(tg, group_path, sizeof(group_path)); \
+ SEQ_printf(m, fmt, group_path); \
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched_debug_lock, flags); \
+ if (token == TOKEN_ACQUIRED) \
+ smp_store_release(&console_token, token); \
+ } \
}
This is disgusting... you have an open-coded test-and-set lock like
thing *AND* a spinlock, what gives?
What's wrong with something simple like this?
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 4b49cc2af5c4..2ac2977f3b96 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
*/
#include "sched.h"
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sched_debug_lock);
-
/*
* This allows printing both to /proc/sched_debug and
* to the console
@@ -470,6 +468,7 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct seq_file *m, int
cpu, struct task_group
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(group_path_lock);
static char group_path[PATH_MAX];
static char *task_group_path(struct task_group *tg)
@@ -481,6 +480,22 @@ static char *task_group_path(struct task_group *tg)
return group_path;
}
+
+#define SEQ_printf_task_group_path(m, tg) \
+do { \
+ if (spin_trylock(&group_path_lock)) { \
+ task_group_path(tg, group_path, sizeof(group_path)); \
+ SEQ_printf(m, "%s", group_path); \
+ spin_unlock(&group_path_lock); \
+ } else { \
+ SEQ_printf(m, "looser!"); \
+ }
+} while (0)
I have no problem with using this as a possible solution as long as
others agree. Of course, I won't use the term "looser". I will be more
polite:-)
The current patch allows all /proc/sched_debug users and one sysrq user
to use the full group_path[] buffer. I can certainly change it to allow
1 user to use the full size path and the rests running the risk of path
truncation.
Cheers,
Longman
