> Am 06.04.2021 um 18:34 schrieb Oscar Salvador <[email protected]>:
> 
> On 2021-04-06 17:32, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> I'd only relax start_pfn. That way the function is pretty much
>> impossible to abuse for sub-section onlining/offlining.
>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!nr_pages ||
>>         !IS_ALIGNED(start_pfn, pageblock_nr_pages))
>>         !IS_ALIGNED(start_pfn + nr_pages, PAGES_PER_SECTION)))
> 
> But this is not going to work.
> When using memmap_on_memory, the nr of pages that online_pages() and 
> offline_pages() get might be less than PAGES_PER_SECTION, so this check will 
> always blow us up.

But not end_pfn as given in my version or what am I missing?


> -- 
> Oscar Salvador
> SUSE L3
> 

Reply via email to