On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 12:18:38PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Add support to PCIe RC controller on Toshiba Visconti ARM SoCs.
> PCIe controller is based of Synopsys DesignWare PCIe core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuji Ishikawa <yuji2.ishik...@toshiba.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwama...@toshiba.co.jp>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig         |  10 +
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile        |   1 +
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c | 358 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 369 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig 
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> index b9aaa84452c4..ae125d7cf375 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
> @@ -286,6 +286,16 @@ config PCIE_TEGRA194_EP
>         in order to enable device-specific features PCIE_TEGRA194_EP must be
>         selected. This uses the DesignWare core.
>  
> +config PCIE_VISCONTI
> +     bool "Toshiba VISCONTI PCIe controllers"
> +     depends on ARCH_VISCONTI || COMPILE_TEST
> +     depends on OF && HAS_IOMEM

Is this line really needed? Seems we have a mixture on other drivers.

> +     depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
> +     select PCIE_DW_HOST
> +     help
> +       Say Y here if you want PCIe controller support on Toshiba Visconti 
> SoC.
> +       This driver supports TMPV77xx.
> +
>  config PCIE_UNIPHIER
>       bool "Socionext UniPhier PCIe host controllers"
>       depends on ARCH_UNIPHIER || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile 
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> index ba7c42f6df6f..46ac5d49dc75 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MESON) += pci-meson.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194) += pcie-tegra194.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER) += pcie-uniphier.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER_EP) += pcie-uniphier-ep.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_VISCONTI) += pcie-visconti.o
>  
>  # The following drivers are for devices that use the generic ACPI
>  # pci_root.c driver but don't support standard ECAM config access.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c 
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e24f83df41b8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-visconti.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * DWC PCIe RC driver for Toshiba Visconti ARM SoC
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2019, 2020 Toshiba Electronic Device & Storage Corporation
> + * Copyright (C) 2020, TOSHIBA CORPORATION
> + *
> + * Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwama...@toshiba.co.jp>
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/resource.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include "pcie-designware.h"
> +#include "../../pci.h"
> +
> +struct visconti_pcie {
> +     struct dw_pcie *pci;

Embed this rather than a pointer. 1 less alloc.

> +     void __iomem *ulreg_base;
> +     void __iomem *smu_base;
> +     void __iomem *mpu_base;
> +     struct clk *refclk;
> +     struct clk *sysclk;
> +     struct clk *auxclk;
> +};
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE              0x00F4
> +#define  PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_EP  0x00
> +#define  PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_RC  0x04
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL    0x00F8
> +#define  PCIE_UL_IOM_PCIE_PERSTN_I_EN        BIT(3)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN_EN    BIT(2)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_PERSTN_OUT          BIT(1)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN               BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_02    0x0104
> +#define  PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_EXT_LD_DONE       BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_03    0x0108
> +#define  PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_INIT_DONE BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1        0x0138
> +#define  PCIE_UL_CFG_PME_INT         BIT(0)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_CFG_LINK_EQ_REQ_INT BIT(1)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT0           BIT(2)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT1           BIT(3)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT2           BIT(4)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT3           BIT(5)
> +#define  PCIE_UL_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1_ALL  (PCIE_UL_CFG_PME_INT | 
> PCIE_UL_CFG_LINK_EQ_REQ_INT | \
> +                                      PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT0 | PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT1 
> | \
> +                                      PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT2 | PCIE_UL_EDMA_INT3)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_SB_MON         0x0198
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_S_SIG_MON                0x019C
> +#define  PCIE_UL_CORE_RST_N_MON              BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_DBG_00     0x0844
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01        0x0860
> +#define  PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE    BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_00              0x0864
> +#define  PCIE_UL_SMLH_LINK_UP                BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02              0x0868
> +#define  PCIE_UL_S_DETECT_ACT                0x01
> +#define  PCIE_UL_S_L0                        0x11
> +
> +#define PISMU_CKON_PCIE                      0x0038
> +#define  PISMU_CKON_PCIE_AUX_CLK     BIT(1)
> +#define  PISMU_CKON_PCIE_MSTR_ACLK   BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE             0x0538
> +#define  PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_ULREG_RST_N        BIT(1)
> +#define  PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_PWR_UP_RST_N       BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN           0x0
> +#define  MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE           BIT(0)
> +
> +#define PCIE_BUS_OFFSET                      0x40000000
> +
> +/* Access registers in PCIe ulreg */
> +static inline void visconti_ulreg_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 
> val, u32 reg)
> +{
> +     writel(val, pcie->ulreg_base + reg);

Do these need ordering WRT DMA? If not, use _relaxed variant.

> +}
> +
> +/* Access registers in PCIe smu */
> +static inline void visconti_smu_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, 
> u32 reg)
> +{
> +     writel(val, pcie->smu_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +/* Access registers in PCIe mpu */
> +static inline void visconti_mpu_writel(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 val, 
> u32 reg)
> +{
> +     writel(val, pcie->mpu_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 visconti_mpu_readl(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, u32 reg)
> +{
> +     return readl(pcie->mpu_base + reg);
> +}
> +
> +static int visconti_pcie_check_link_status(struct visconti_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +     int err;
> +     u32 val;
> +
> +     /* wait for linkup of phy link layer */
> +     err = readl_poll_timeout(pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_00, 
> val,
> +                              (val & PCIE_UL_SMLH_LINK_UP), 1000, 10000);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     /* wait for linkup of data link layer */
> +     err = readl_poll_timeout(pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02, 
> val,
> +                              (val & PCIE_UL_S_DETECT_ACT), 1000, 10000);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     /* wait for LTSSM Status */
> +     return readl_poll_timeout(pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_V_PHY_ST_02, 
> val,
> +                               (val & PCIE_UL_S_L0), 1000, 10000);
> +}
> +
> +static int visconti_pcie_establish_link(struct pcie_port *pp)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +     u32 val;
> +     struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +     struct visconti_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(pci->dev);
> +
> +     visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE, 
> PCIE_UL_REG_V_SII_GEN_CTRL_01);
> +
> +     ret = visconti_pcie_check_link_status(pcie);
> +     if (ret < 0) {
> +             dev_info(pci->dev, "Link failure\n");
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +
> +     val = visconti_mpu_readl(pcie, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> +     visconti_mpu_writel(pcie, val & ~MPU_MP_EN_DISABLE, PCIE_MPU_REG_MP_EN);
> +
> +     visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1_ALL, 
> PCIE_UL_REG_S_INT_EVENT_MASK1);

Seems like all this should be a phy driver.

> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int visconti_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +     struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +
> +     dw_pcie_setup_rc(pp);

> +     ret = visconti_pcie_establish_link(pp);
> +     if (ret < 0)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     dw_pcie_wait_for_link(pci);

The DWC core code does link handling now.

> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops visconti_pcie_host_ops = {
> +     .host_init = visconti_pcie_host_init,
> +};
> +
> +static u64 visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup(struct dw_pcie *pci, u64 pci_addr)
> +{
> +     return pci_addr - PCIE_BUS_OFFSET;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> +     .cpu_addr_fixup = visconti_pcie_cpu_addr_fixup,
> +};
> +
> +static int visconti_get_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +                               struct visconti_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +
> +     pcie->pci->dbi_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, 
> "dbi");
> +     if (IS_ERR(pcie->pci->dbi_base))
> +             return PTR_ERR(pcie->pci->dbi_base);

The DWC core handles this now.

> +
> +     pcie->ulreg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "ulreg");
> +     if (IS_ERR(pcie->ulreg_base))
> +             return PTR_ERR(pcie->ulreg_base);
> +
> +     pcie->smu_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "smu");
> +     if (IS_ERR(pcie->smu_base))
> +             return PTR_ERR(pcie->smu_base);
> +
> +     pcie->mpu_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "mpu");
> +     if (IS_ERR(pcie->mpu_base))
> +             return PTR_ERR(pcie->mpu_base);
> +
> +     pcie->refclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pcie_refclk");
> +     if (IS_ERR(pcie->refclk)) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "Failed to get refclk clock: %ld\n", 
> PTR_ERR(pcie->refclk));
> +             return PTR_ERR(pcie->refclk);
> +     }
> +
> +     pcie->sysclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "sysclk");
> +     if (IS_ERR(pcie->sysclk)) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "Failed to get sysclk clock: %ld\n", 
> PTR_ERR(pcie->sysclk));
> +             return PTR_ERR(pcie->sysclk);
> +     }
> +
> +     pcie->auxclk = devm_clk_get(dev, "auxclk");
> +     if (IS_ERR(pcie->auxclk)) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "Failed to get auxclk clock: %ld\n", 
> PTR_ERR(pcie->auxclk));
> +             return PTR_ERR(pcie->auxclk);
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int visconti_device_turnon(struct visconti_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +     int err;
> +     u32 val;
> +
> +     visconti_smu_writel(pcie, PISMU_CKON_PCIE_AUX_CLK | 
> PISMU_CKON_PCIE_MSTR_ACLK,
> +                         PISMU_CKON_PCIE);

Clock control? Should be a clock provider then.

> +     ndelay(250);
> +
> +     visconti_smu_writel(pcie, PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_ULREG_RST_N, 
> PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE);
> +
> +     visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE_RC, 
> PCIE_UL_REG_S_PCIE_MODE);
> +
> +     val = PCIE_UL_IOM_PCIE_PERSTN_I_EN | PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN_EN | 
> PCIE_UL_DIRECT_PERSTN;
> +     visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL);
> +     udelay(100);
> +
> +     val |= PCIE_UL_PERSTN_OUT;
> +     visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, val, PCIE_UL_REG_S_PERSTN_CTRL);
> +     udelay(100);
> +
> +     visconti_smu_writel(pcie, PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE_PWR_UP_RST_N, 
> PISMU_RSOFF_PCIE);
> +
> +     err = readl_poll_timeout(pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_03, 
> val,
> +                              (val & PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_INIT_DONE), 100, 
> 1000);
> +     if (err)
> +             return err;
> +
> +     visconti_ulreg_writel(pcie, PCIE_UL_PHY0_SRAM_EXT_LD_DONE, 
> PCIE_UL_REG_S_PHY_INIT_02);
> +
> +     return readl_poll_timeout(pcie->ulreg_base + PCIE_UL_REG_S_SIG_MON, val,
> +                              (val & PCIE_UL_CORE_RST_N_MON), 100, 1000);
> +}
> +
> +static int visconti_add_pcie_port(struct visconti_pcie *pcie, struct 
> platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> +     struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp;
> +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     pp->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "intr");
> +     if (pp->irq < 0) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "interrupt intr is missing");
> +             return pp->irq;
> +     }
> +
> +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> +             pp->msi_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "msi");
> +             if (pp->msi_irq < 0) {
> +                     dev_err(dev, "interrupt msi is missing");
> +                     return pp->msi_irq;
> +             }
> +     }

DWC core handles this now.

> +
> +     pp->ops = &visconti_pcie_host_ops;
> +
> +     pci->link_gen = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(pdev->dev.of_node);
> +     if (pci->link_gen < 0 || pci->link_gen > 3) {
> +             pci->link_gen = 3;
> +             dev_dbg(dev, "Applied default link speed\n");
> +     }
> +
> +     dev_dbg(dev, "link speed Gen %d", pci->link_gen);
> +
> +     ret = visconti_device_turnon(pcie);
> +     if (ret)
> +             goto error;
> +
> +     ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
> +     if (ret)
> +             dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize host\n");
> +
> +error:
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int visconti_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +     struct visconti_pcie *pcie;
> +     struct pcie_port *pp;
> +     struct dw_pcie *pci;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     ret = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(36));
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!pcie)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     pci = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pci), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     if (!pci)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     pp = &pci->pp;
> +     pp->num_vectors = MAX_MSI_IRQS;
> +
> +     pci->dev = dev;
> +     pci->ops = &dw_pcie_ops;
> +     pcie->pci = pci;
> +
> +     ret = visconti_get_resources(pdev, pcie);
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> +
> +     return visconti_add_pcie_port(pcie, pdev);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id visconti_pcie_match[] = {
> +     { .compatible = "toshiba,visconti-pcie" },
> +     {},
> +};
> +
> +static struct platform_driver visconti_pcie_driver = {
> +     .probe = visconti_pcie_probe,
> +     .driver = {
> +             .name = "visconti-pcie",
> +             .of_match_table = visconti_pcie_match,
> +             .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> +     },
> +};
> +
> +builtin_platform_driver(visconti_pcie_driver);
> -- 
> 2.30.0.rc2
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Reply via email to