On 14/04/21 04:28, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:15 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:

On 13/04/21 13:03, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
This patch claims that it has a place to
stash the IRQ when EFLAGS.IF=0, but inject_pending_event() seams to ignore
EFLAGS.IF and queues the IRQ to the guest directly in the first branch
of using "kvm_x86_ops.set_irq(vcpu)".

This is only true for pure-userspace irqchip.  For split-irqchip, in
which case the "place to stash" the interrupt is
vcpu->arch.pending_external_vector.

For pure-userspace irqchip, KVM_INTERRUPT only cares about being able to
stash the interrupt in vcpu->arch.interrupt.injected.  It is indeed
wrong for userspace to call KVM_INTERRUPT if the vCPU is not ready for
interrupt injection, but KVM_INTERRUPT does not return an error.

Thanks for the reply.

May I ask what is the correct/practical way of using KVM_INTERRUPT ABI
for pure-userspace irqchip.

gVisor is indeed a pure-userspace irqchip, it will call KVM_INTERRUPT
when kvm_run->ready_for_interrupt_injection=1 (along with other conditions
unrelated to our discussion).

https://github.com/google/gvisor/blob/a9441aea2780da8c93da1c73da860219f98438de/pkg/sentry/platform/kvm/bluepill_amd64_unsafe.go#L105

if kvm_run->ready_for_interrupt_injection=1 when expection pending or
EFLAGS.IF=0, it would be unexpected for gVisor.

Not with EFLAGS.IF=0. For pending exception, there is code to handle it in inject_pending_event:

        ... if (!vcpu->arch.exception.pending) {
                if (vcpu->arch.nmi_injected) {
                        static_call(kvm_x86_set_nmi)(vcpu);
                        can_inject = false;
                } else if (vcpu->arch.interrupt.injected) {
                        static_call(kvm_x86_set_irq)(vcpu);
                        can_inject = false;
                }
        }
        ...
        if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending) {
                ...
                can_inject = false;
        }
        // this is vcpu->arch.interrupt.injected for userspace LAPIC
        if (kvm_cpu_has_injectable_intr(vcpu)) {
r = can_inject ? static_call(kvm_x86_interrupt_allowed)(vcpu, true) : -EBUSY;
                if (r < 0)
                        goto busy;
                ...
        }

so what happens is:

- the interrupt will not be injected before the exception

- KVM will schedule an immediate vmexit to inject the interrupt as well

- if (as is likely) the exception has turned off interrupts, the next call to inject_pending_event will reach static_call(kvm_x86_enable_irq_window) and the interrupt will only be injected when IF becomes 1 again.

Paolo

Reply via email to