Hi all, On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 11:55:29 -0700 Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:23:55 +0200 Christophe Leroy > <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> wrote: > > > + * is done. STRICT_MODULE_RWX may require extra work to support this > > > + * too. > > > + */ > > > > > > - return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END, > > > GFP_KERNEL, > > > - PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS, > > > NUMA_NO_NODE, > > > > > > I think you should add the following in <asm/pgtable.h> > > > > #ifndef MODULES_VADDR > > #define MODULES_VADDR VMALLOC_START > > #define MODULES_END VMALLOC_END > > #endif > > > > And leave module_alloc() as is (just removing the enclosing #ifdef > > MODULES_VADDR and adding the > > VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP flag) > > > > This would minimise the conflits with the changes I did in powerpc/next > > reported by Stephen R. > > > > I'll drop powerpc-64s-radix-enable-huge-vmalloc-mappings.patch for now, > make life simpler.
I have dropped that patch from linux-next. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
pgpxAl10ZqUKJ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
