On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:26:03PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Am 2021-04-16 20:44, schrieb Rob Herring:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:49:23PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > The goal is to fetch a (base) MAC address from the OTP region of a
> > > SPI NOR
> > > flash.
> > >
> > > This is the first part, where I try to add the nvmem provider
> > > support to
> > > the MTD core.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure about the device tree bindings. Consider the following
> > > two
> > > variants:
> > >
> > > (1)
> > > flash@0 {
> > > ..
> > >
> > > otp {
> > > compatible = "mtd-user-otp";
> >
> > mtd is a linuxism. Why not just 'nvmem-cells' here or as a fallback if
> > we come up with a better name?
>
> There are two different compatibles: "mtd-user-otp" and "mtd-factory-otp"
> to differentiate what kind of OTP should be used (and both are possible
> at the same time). Thus nvmem-cells alone won't be enough. We could drop
> the "mtd-" prefix though.
>
> Is there a benefit of having the following?
> compatible = "user-otp", "nvmem-cells";
Yes. I assume 'user-otp' tells you something about the region and
'nvmem-cells' tells you that there are child nodes of nvmem data. Of
course 'user-otp' could imply 'nvmem-cells' as you did. I'm fine with
either way.
Rob
