Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/20/20 12:35, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall > through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c > index 9c1f7c4de65b..e98af0b9d00c 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c > @@ -1854,6 +1854,7 @@ static int rs_check_takeover(struct raid_set *rs) > ((mddev->layout == ALGORITHM_PARITY_N && mddev->new_layout > == ALGORITHM_PARITY_N) || > __within_range(mddev->new_layout, > ALGORITHM_LEFT_ASYMMETRIC, ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC))) > return 0; > + break; > > default: > break; >
