> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@intel.com>
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 2:33 PM
> To: mgr...@linux.intel.com; markgr...@kernel.org; a...@arndb.de; b...@suse.de;
> damien.lem...@wdc.com; dragan.cve...@xilinx.com;
> gre...@linuxfoundation.org; cor...@lwn.net; palmerdabb...@google.com;
> paul.walms...@sifive.com; peng....@nxp.com; robh...@kernel.org;
> shawn...@kernel.org; jassisinghb...@gmail.com
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Kelly, Seamus <seamus.ke...@intel.com>;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings
> 
> On 2/12/21 2:22 PM, mgr...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) # Copyright (c)
> > +Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/misc/intel,keembay-xlink.yaml#";
> > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#";
> > +
> > +title: Intel Keem Bay xlink
> 
> Is there a specific reason this is dual licensed?  If so, can you please 
> include
> information about the license choice in the next post's cover letter?
> 
> If there is no specific reason for this contribution to be dual licensed, 
> please make it
> GPL-2.0 only.
I will.

I'm just waiting on some testing before making the next post.

Thanks,
--mark

Reply via email to