On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 09:08:36PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 12:38 PM <ira.we...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
> >
> > The function run_dax() was missing a prototype when compiling with
> > warnings.
> >
> > Add bus.h to fix this.
> >
>
> Always include the warning and the compiler in the changelog.
Sorry.
> I
> suspect you hit this with LLVM and not gcc?
No this was with gcc.
gcc -Wp,-MMD,drivers/dax/.super.o.d -nostdinc -I./arch/x86/include
...
-D__KBUILD_MODNAME=kmod_dax -c -o drivers/dax/super.o drivers/dax/super.c ;
./tools/objtool/objtool orc generate --no-fp --retpoline --uaccess
drivers/dax/super.o
drivers/dax/super.c:276:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘run_dax’
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
276 | void run_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
| ^~~~~~~
>
> super.c has no business including bus.h. If the bots are tripping over
> this a better fix is to move it into dax-private.h.
It was not a bot just me using W=1.
I can ignore it or move the prototype to dax-private.h.
Ira
