On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 02:43:20AM +0000, ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> 
> 在 2022/7/19 6:56, Dan Williams 写道:
> > Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 11:21:44AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >>>> This patch is inspired by Dan's "mm, dax, pmem: Introduce
> >>>> dev_pagemap_failure()"[1].  With the help of dax_holder and
> >>>> ->notify_failure() mechanism, the pmem driver is able to ask filesystem
> >>>> (or mapped device) on it to unmap all files in use and notify processes
> >>>> who are using those files.
> >>>>
> >>>> Call trace:
> >>>> trigger unbind
> >>>>   -> unbind_store()
> >>>>    -> ... (skip)
> >>>>     -> devres_release_all()   # was pmem driver ->remove() in v1
> >>>>      -> kill_dax()
> >>>>       -> dax_holder_notify_failure(dax_dev, 0, U64_MAX, 
> >>>> MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE)
> >>>>        -> xfs_dax_notify_failure()
> >>>>
> >>>> Introduce MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE to let filesystem know this is a remove
> >>>> event.  So do not shutdown filesystem directly if something not
> >>>> supported, or if failure range includes metadata area.  Make sure all
> >>>> files and processes are handled correctly.
> >>>>
> >>>> ==
> >>>> Changes since v5:
> >>>>    1. Renamed MF_MEM_REMOVE to MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE
> >>>>    2. hold s_umount before sync_filesystem()
> >>>>    3. move sync_filesystem() after SB_BORN check
> >>>>    4. Rebased on next-20220714
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes since v4:
> >>>>    1. sync_filesystem() at the beginning when MF_MEM_REMOVE
> >>>>    2. Rebased on next-20220706
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]: 
> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/161604050314.1463742.14151665140035795571.st...@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>   drivers/dax/super.c         |  3 ++-
> >>>>   fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >>>>   include/linux/mm.h          |  1 +
> >>>>   3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/dax/super.c b/drivers/dax/super.c
> >>>> index 9b5e2a5eb0ae..cf9a64563fbe 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/dax/super.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/dax/super.c
> >>>> @@ -323,7 +323,8 @@ void kill_dax(struct dax_device *dax_dev)
> >>>>                  return;
> >>>>   
> >>>>          if (dax_dev->holder_data != NULL)
> >>>> -                dax_holder_notify_failure(dax_dev, 0, U64_MAX, 0);
> >>>> +                dax_holder_notify_failure(dax_dev, 0, U64_MAX,
> >>>> +                                MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE);
> >>>>   
> >>>>          clear_bit(DAXDEV_ALIVE, &dax_dev->flags);
> >>>>          synchronize_srcu(&dax_srcu);
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c
> >>>> index 69d9c83ea4b2..6da6747435eb 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c
> >>>> @@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ xfs_dax_failure_fn(
> >>>>   
> >>>>          if (XFS_RMAP_NON_INODE_OWNER(rec->rm_owner) ||
> >>>>              (rec->rm_flags & (XFS_RMAP_ATTR_FORK | 
> >>>> XFS_RMAP_BMBT_BLOCK))) {
> >>>> +                /* Do not shutdown so early when device is to be 
> >>>> removed */
> >>>> +                if (notify->mf_flags & MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE)
> >>>> +                        return 0;
> >>>>                  xfs_force_shutdown(mp, SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_ONDISK);
> >>>>                  return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> >>>>          }
> >>>> @@ -174,12 +177,22 @@ xfs_dax_notify_failure(
> >>>>          struct xfs_mount        *mp = dax_holder(dax_dev);
> >>>>          u64                     ddev_start;
> >>>>          u64                     ddev_end;
> >>>> +        int                     error;
> >>>>   
> >>>>          if (!(mp->m_sb.sb_flags & SB_BORN)) {
> >>>>                  xfs_warn(mp, "filesystem is not ready for 
> >>>> notify_failure()!");
> >>>>                  return -EIO;
> >>>>          }
> >>>>   
> >>>> +        if (mf_flags & MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE) {
> >>>> +                xfs_info(mp, "device is about to be removed!");
> >>>> +                down_write(&mp->m_super->s_umount);
> >>>> +                error = sync_filesystem(mp->m_super);
> >>>> +                up_write(&mp->m_super->s_umount);
> >>>
> >>> Are all mappings invalidated after this point?
> >>
> >> No; all this step does is pushes dirty filesystem [meta]data to pmem
> >> before we lose DAXDEV_ALIVE...
> >>
> >>> The goal of the removal notification is to invalidate all DAX mappings
> >>> that are no pointing to pfns that do not exist anymore, so just syncing
> >>> does not seem like enough, and the shutdown is skipped above. What am I
> >>> missing?
> >>
> >> ...however, the shutdown above only applies to filesystem metadata.  In
> >> effect, we avoid the fs shutdown in MF_MEM_PRE_REMOVE mode, which
> >> enables the mf_dax_kill_procs calls to proceed against mapped file data.
> >> I have a nagging suspicion that in non-PREREMOVE mode, we can end up
> >> shutting down the filesytem on an xattr block and the 'return
> >> -EFSCORRUPTED' actually prevents us from reaching all the remaining file
> >> data mappings.
> >>
> >> IOWs, I think that clause above really ought to have returned zero so
> >> that we keep the filesystem up while we're tearing down mappings, and
> >> only call xfs_force_shutdown() after we've had a chance to let
> >> xfs_dax_notify_ddev_failure() tear down all the mappings.
> >>
> >> I missed that subtlety in the initial ~30 rounds of review, but I figure
> >> at this point let's just land it in 5.20 and clean up that quirk for
> >> -rc1.
> > 
> > Sure, this is a good baseline to incrementally improve.
> 
> Hi Dan, Darrick
> 
> Do I need to fix somewhere on this patch?  I'm not sure if it is looked 
> good...

Eh, wait for me to send the xfs pull request and then I'll clean things
up and send you a patch. :)

--D

> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Ruan.
> 
> > 
> >>
> >>> Notice that kill_dev_dax() does unmap_mapping_range() after invalidating
> >>> the dax device and that ensures that all existing mappings are gone and
> >>> cannot be re-established. As far as I can see a process with an existing
> >>> dax mapping will still be able to use it after this runs, no?
> >>
> >> I'm not sure where in akpm's tree I find kill_dev_dax()?  I'm cribbing
> >> off of:
> >>
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git/tree/fs/xfs/xfs_notify_failure.c?h=mm-stable
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git/tree/drivers/dax/bus.c?h=mm-stable#n381
> > 
> > Where the observation is that when device-dax is told that the device is
> > going away it invalidates all the active mappings to that single
> > character-device-inode. The hope being that in the fsdax case all the
> > dax-mapped filesystem inodes would experience the same irreversible
> > invalidation as the device is exiting.

Reply via email to