On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 04:19:14PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Commit f50169324df4 ("module.h: split out the EXPORT_SYMBOL into
> export.h") appropriately separated EXPORT_SYMBOL into <linux/export.h>
> because modules and EXPORT_SYMBOL are orthogonal; modules are symbol
> consumers, while EXPORT_SYMBOL are used by symbol providers, which
> may not be necessarily a module.
>
> However, that commit also relocated THIS_MODULE. As explained in the
> commit description, the intention was to define THIS_MODULE in a
> lightweight header, but I do not believe <linux/export.h> was the
> suitable location because EXPORT_SYMBOL and THIS_MODULE are unrelated.
>
> Move it to another lightweight header, <linux/init.h>. The reason for
> choosing <linux/init.h> is to make <linux/moduleparam.h> self-contained
> without relying on <linux/linkage.h> incorrectly including
> <linux/export.h>.
>
> With this adjustment, the role of <linux/export.h> becomes clearer as
> it only defines EXPORT_SYMBOL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahi...@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcg...@kernel.org>
Do you want this this to go through modules-next or your tree? I'm fine
it goes either way.
Luis
