On Wed, 07 Feb 2024 06:50:59 +0100 Sven Schnelle <sv...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Steven, > Not sure whether that is enough, have to test. However, it's not really > a fix, it would just require a bit more load and the test would fail > again. The fundamental problem is that even after disabling tracing > there might be some tracing line added due to the lockless nature of > the ringbuffer. This might then replace some existing cmdline entry. > So maybe we should change the test to ignore the program name when > calculating the checksums. Have you figured out what caused the cmdlines to change when tracing is off. It shouldn't be updated even with just 128 entries. I'm also looking into a way to keep more of a LRU command lines around, but nothing concrete yet. -- Steve
