On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 13:41:59 -0800 Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 13:39, Linus Torvalds > <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > So the above "complexity" is *literally* just changing the > > > > (new = atomic_read_acquire(&my->seq)) != old > > > > condition to > > > > should_exit || > > (new = atomic_read_acquire(&my->seq)) != old > > .. and obviously you'll need to add the exit condition to the actual > "deal with events" loop too. I haven't had a chance to rework this part of the patches, but I have some other fixes to push to you from earlier this week, and I think the first three patches of this series are also fine. As the loop in ring_buffer_wait() isn't needed, and patch 2 and 3 are trivial bugs. I'll send you a pull request for that work and I'll work on this code later. -- Steve
