On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 10:19:57AM -0400, Aren Moynihan wrote:
> The vdd and leda supplies must be powered on for the chip to function
> and can be powered off during system suspend.
>
> Co-developed-by: Ondrej Jirman <m...@xff.cz>
Missing SoB. Please, read Submitting Patches documentation for understanding
what has to be done here.
> Signed-off-by: Aren Moynihan <a...@peacevolution.org>
...
> Notes:
> I'm not sure what the proper way to handle attribution for this patch
> is. It was origionally based on a patch by Ondrej Jirman[1], but I have
> rewritten a large portion if it. I have included a Co-developed-by tag
> to indicate this, but haven't sent him this patch, so I'm not sure what
> to do about a Signed-off-by.
Ah, seems you already aware of this issue. So, either drop Co-developed-by
(and if you wish you may give a credit in a free form inside commit message)
or make sure you get his SoB tag.
...
> mutex_init(&data->lock);
Somewhere (in the previous patch?) you want to switch to devm_mutex_init().
...
> + ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(&client->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(data->supplies),
> + data->supplies);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret, "get regulators
> failed\n");
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> + "regulator enable failed\n");
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev,
> stk3310_regulators_disable, data);
> + if (ret)
> + return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, ret,
> + "failed to register regulator cleanup\n");
With
struct devuce *dev = &client->dev;
at the top of the function makes these and more lines neater.
...
> static int stk3310_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> - u8 state = 0;
> struct stk3310_data *data;
> + u8 state = 0;
> + int ret;
While changing to RCT order here, it seems you have inconsistent approach
elsewhere (in your own patches!). Please, be consistent with chosen style.
> data = iio_priv(i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev)));
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
