On 28.01.2025 11:55 AM, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 11:45:51AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 27.01.2025 11:45 PM, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> For example MSM8974 has mx voltage rail exposed as regulator and only cx
>>> voltage rail is exposed as power domain. This power domain (cx) is
>>> attached internally in power domain and cannot be attached in this driver.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 8750cf392394 ("remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Allow replacing regulators
>>> with power domains")
>>> Co-developed-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtim...@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matti Lehtimäki <matti.lehtim...@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <l...@lucaweiss.eu>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>>> b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>>> index
>>> e78bd986dc3f256effce4470222c0a5faeea86ec..0e1b0934ceedd13d5790b798afc95d68a8314c75
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
>>> @@ -1831,6 +1831,13 @@ static int q6v5_pds_attach(struct device *dev,
>>> struct device **devs,
>>> while (pd_names[num_pds])
>>> num_pds++;
>>>
>>> + /* Handle single power domain */
>>> + if (num_pds == 1 && dev->pm_domain) {
>>> + devs[0] = dev;
>>> + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
>>
>> This call can fail
>>
>
> It returns void though? :D
>
> void pm_runtime_enable(struct device *dev);
*wipes glasses very hard*
oh..
Konrad
