On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 12:08:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:27 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:34:49AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 6:56 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 11:39:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:46 AM Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 10:45 AM Cindy Lu <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Introduce a new config knob 
> > > > > > > > `CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLE_FORK_OWNER_IOCTL`,
> > > > > > > > to control the availability of the `VHOST_FORK_FROM_OWNER` 
> > > > > > > > ioctl.
> > > > > > > > When CONFIG_VHOST_ENABLE_FORK_OWNER_IOCTL is set to n, the ioctl
> > > > > > > > is disabled, and any attempt to use it will result in failure.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think we need to describe why the default value was chosen to 
> > > > > > > be false.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What's more, should we document the implications here?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > inherit_owner was set to false: this means "legacy" userspace may
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I meant "true" actually.
> > > > >
> > > > > MIchael, I'd expect inherit_owner to be false. Otherwise legacy
> > > > > applications need to be modified in order to get the behaviour
> > > > > recovered which is an impossible taks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any idea on this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> >
> > So, let's say we had a modparam? Enough for this customer?
> > WDYT?
> 
> Just to make sure I understand the proposal.
> 
> Did you mean a module parameter like "inherit_owner_by_default"? I
> think it would be fine if we make it false by default.
> 
> Thanks

I think we should keep it true by default, changing the default
risks regressing what we already fixes. The specific customer can
flip the modparam and be happy.

> >
> > --
> > MST
> >


Reply via email to