On Mon, 26 May 2025 at 15:50, Konstantin Shkolnyy <k...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The test outputs:
> "SOCK_STREAM SHUT_RD...expected send(2) failure, got 1".
>
> It tests that shutdown(fd, SHUT_RD) on one side causes send() to fail on
> the other side. However, sometimes there is a delay in delivery of the
> SHUT_RD command, send() succeeds and the test fails, even though the
> command is properly delivered and send() starts failing several
> milliseconds later.
>
> The delay occurs in the kernel because the used buffer notification
> callback virtio_vsock_rx_done(), called upon receipt of the SHUT_RD
> command, doesn't immediately disable send(). It delegates that to
> a kernel thread (via vsock->rx_work). Sometimes that thread is delayed
> more than the test expects.
>
> Change the test to keep calling send() until it fails or a timeout occurs.
>
> Fixes: b698bd97c5711 ("test/vsock: shutdowned socket test")
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Shkolnyy <k...@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Move the new function to utils.c.
BTW I think I already fixed the same issue in this series:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250514141927.159456-1-sgarz...@redhat.com/
Can you check it?
Thanks,
Stefano
>
> tools/testing/vsock/util.c | 11 +++++++++++
> tools/testing/vsock/util.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 14 ++------------
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> index de25892f865f..04ac88dc4d3a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
> @@ -798,3 +798,14 @@ void enable_so_zerocopy_check(int fd)
> setsockopt_int_check(fd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ZEROCOPY, 1,
> "setsockopt SO_ZEROCOPY");
> }
> +
> +void vsock_test_for_send_failure(int fd, int send_flags)
> +{
> + timeout_begin(TIMEOUT);
> + while (true) {
> + if (send(fd, "A", 1, send_flags) == -1)
> + return;
> + timeout_check("expected send(2) failure");
> + }
> + timeout_end();
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/util.h b/tools/testing/vsock/util.h
> index d1f765ce3eee..58c17cfb63d4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/util.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/util.h
> @@ -79,4 +79,5 @@ void setsockopt_int_check(int fd, int level, int optname,
> int val,
> void setsockopt_timeval_check(int fd, int level, int optname,
> struct timeval val, char const *errmsg);
> void enable_so_zerocopy_check(int fd);
> +void vsock_test_for_send_failure(int fd, int send_flags);
> #endif /* UTIL_H */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> index 613551132a96..b68a85a6d929 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> @@ -1060,15 +1060,9 @@ static void sigpipe(int signo)
>
> static void test_stream_check_sigpipe(int fd)
> {
> - ssize_t res;
> -
> have_sigpipe = 0;
>
> - res = send(fd, "A", 1, 0);
> - if (res != -1) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "expected send(2) failure, got %zi\n", res);
> - exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> - }
> + vsock_test_for_send_failure(fd, 0);
>
> if (!have_sigpipe) {
> fprintf(stderr, "SIGPIPE expected\n");
> @@ -1077,11 +1071,7 @@ static void test_stream_check_sigpipe(int fd)
>
> have_sigpipe = 0;
>
> - res = send(fd, "A", 1, MSG_NOSIGNAL);
> - if (res != -1) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "expected send(2) failure, got %zi\n", res);
> - exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> - }
> + vsock_test_for_send_failure(fd, MSG_NOSIGNAL);
>
> if (have_sigpipe) {
> fprintf(stderr, "SIGPIPE not expected\n");
> --
> 2.34.1
>
