On 6/4/25 11:07, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 10:44:42PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> +static int __get_transports(void)
>> +{
>> + /* Order must match transports defined in util.h.
>> + * man nm: "d" The symbol is in the initialized data section.
>> + */
>> + const char * const syms[] = {
>> + "d loopback_transport",
>> + "d virtio_transport",
>> + "d vhost_transport",
>> + "d vmci_transport",
>> + "d hvs_transport",
>> + };
>
> I would move this array (or a macro that define it), near the transport
> defined in util.h, so they are near and we can easily update/review
> changes.
>
> BTW what about adding static asserts to check we are aligned?
Something like
#define KNOWN_TRANSPORTS \
_(LOOPBACK, "loopback") \
_(VIRTIO, "virtio") \
_(VHOST, "vhost") \
_(VMCI, "vmci") \
_(HYPERV, "hvs")
enum transport {
TRANSPORT_COUNTER_BASE = __COUNTER__ + 1,
#define _(name, symbol) \
TRANSPORT_##name = _BITUL(__COUNTER__ - TRANSPORT_COUNTER_BASE),
KNOWN_TRANSPORTS
TRANSPORT_NUM = __COUNTER__ - TRANSPORT_COUNTER_BASE,
#undef _
};
static char * const transport_ksyms[] = {
#define _(name, symbol) "d " symbol "_transport",
KNOWN_TRANSPORTS
#undef _
};
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(transport_ksyms) == TRANSPORT_NUM);
?
Note that I keep pushing for naming HVS a TRANSPORT_HYPERV. Perhaps it's
better to stick to TRANSPORT_HVS after all?
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/util.h b/tools/testing/vsock/util.h
>> index
>> 0afe7cbae12e5194172c639ccfbeb8b81f7c25ac..63953e32c3e18e1aa5c2addcf6f09f433660fa84
>> 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/util.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/util.h
>> @@ -3,8 +3,19 @@
>> #define UTIL_H
>>
>> #include <sys/socket.h>
>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>> #include <linux/vm_sockets.h>
>>
>> +#define KALLSYMS_PATH "/proc/kallsyms"
>> +#define KALLSYMS_LINE_LEN 512
>
> We don't need to expose them in util.h IMO, we can keep in util.c
OK, sure.
Thanks,
Michal
