On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:39:43 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote: > > FWIW you can steal bpftrace integration from this series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250421222827.283737-22-k...@kernel.org/ > > Yes, that would be great. I think we can iterate until we hit the poll > path, otherwise we skip the test at timeout. Something as: > > while (true): > send msg > if netpoll_poll_dev() was invoked: > ksft_exit > > if timeout: > raise KsftSkipEx > > As soon as your code lands, I will adapt the test to do so. Meanwhile, > I will send the v1 for the netpoll, and later we can iterate. > > Thanks for working on this bfptrace helper. This will be useful on other > usecases as well.
Right, you're the second person I pointed that patch out to. Would be great if someone could steal that patch and make it a part of their series so that it gets merged :S But it's alright if you prefer to stick to non-bpftrace testing for now..
