On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 15:28:29 +0200 Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 3:11 PM Onur <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Aha, I see. I missed that. I guess `allow` was added when the author > > had this lint enabled on their checkout, but their work was merged > > when lint removal was merged before that. > > Yeah, some of the code going around was written years ago, so > sometimes this sort of thing happens. :) > > > Do you want me to update the patch description by including > > 5e7c9b84ad08 ref and send v4? > > Sure -- maybe wait a few days, to see if anyone says anything else. > Then we will need to wait for Acked-bys from other maintainers. > > Or, actually, if you are sending a new version and you are willing to > do it, then it would be easier to land if you split the first patch > also by subsystem -- that way each maintainer can take their patches > on their own time instead. Since each patch is independent, you can > send them in independent patch series, that makes it even easier for > maintainers to track. I don't have enough time to do it right now, but I would be happy to do it in ~3 days during the week (assuming it's still not being reviewed by the maintainers by then). Regards, Onur
