On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 3:03 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 7/9/25 1:56 PM, Luca Weiss wrote: >> On Wed Jun 25, 2025 at 4:20 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> On 6/25/25 4:10 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>>> On 6/25/25 11:18 AM, Luca Weiss wrote: >>>>> Add RPMH regulators exposed by Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. PM7550 PMIC. >>>>> It has 6 FTS525 (FT-SMPS) and 23 LDOs with 3 different types. >>>>> L1-L11 are LDO515 LV NMOS, L12-L13 are LDO515 MV PMOS, L14-L23 are >>>>> LDO512 MV PMOS. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.we...@fairphone.com> >>>>> --- >>>> >>>> FWIW everything you said in the commit message is correct, but I'm not >>>> 100% sure how to map these LDO types to the existing definitions >>> >>> OK so found another page (also made sure that the supply maps are >>> indeed OK) >>> >>> SMPS is OK >>> L1-L11 is OK >>> L14-23 is OK >>> >>> L12/13 -> pmic5_pldo515_mv >> >> Based on what are you saying that? >> >> Based on 80-62408-1 Rev. AG for the LDO515, the Output voltage range for >> MV PMOS is "programmable range 1.504-3.544" which matches "pmic5_pldo". >> >> But yes, in the table next to it, it's saying 1.8-3.3V, which matches >> "pmic5_pldo515_mv". >> >> If you're sure, I can update it but the datasheet is a bit confusing. >> Let me know! > > I was looking at the same datasheet as you and took into account both > the LDO type from e.g. Table 3-12 and the output ranges from Table 3-24
But why, looking at table 3-24, is there a mismatch between that text "programmable range 1.504-3.544" and the table on the right saying min 1.8 and max 3.3V? Programmable range sounds more like what we'd want? No clue... > > Konrad
